Once upon a time, many moons ago, I used to be a New Democratic Party supporter. I come from a “have-not” province, primarily driven by small-business, and the NDP focused strongly on that demographic. I can’t be entirely sure who changed, me or them, but I suspect it was a bit of both. I believe that, as I became more conservative, they became more liberal. As moral-standards became more important to me, it became less important to them. It’s a shame, really, because the NDP is very attractive to Mom n’ Pop farms, small-businesses, and seniors. Unfortunately, these also tend to be three of the most conservative demographics out there.
While the Christian majority in Atlantic Canada was uniting on their “pro-life” stance, the NDP chose to go officially “pro-choice,” which would be more accurately described as “pro-parental-life/death-choice.” Let’s be honest… you can wrap it up in all the pleasant or horrific terminology you like, but what we’re really asking is: Does a parent have the right to determine whether their child lives or dies? Once upon a time, most would have said “Of course not!” These days, however, moral distinctions aren’t as clear, and I believe it won’t be too much longer before parents are granted that choice, quite possibly up until a child is 5 years of age, when they enter the public school system and become an investment by the taxpayer.
The NDP’s enthusiastic support of same-sex marriage hasn’t helped them woo the right-wings, and their mission to alienate the Christian majority has received no small help from their encouragement for stem-cell research. As a member of that Christian right, one would think I’d be thoroughly distanced from the NDP, but nope. There’s still more work to do! Over the past few decades, since the end of Ed Broadbent’s reign over the party, the NDP has been on a downward spiral into the Negative Zone. How can you tell if an NDP’er is bashing someone else? Their lips are moving.
As a third-party, it’s the NDP’s job to criticize, but they’ve made it an art to be as negative as humanly possible. Now they’ve decided to go negative with their political advertising as well, which is ironic when it’s coming from a party that consistently accuses the Liberals and Conservatives for being too friendly with their US colleagues, and emulating them too closely.
Quite frankly, I’m tired of hearing them. I certainly wouldn’t echo Mike Klander’s ad hominem profanity directed at NDP leader, Jack Layton – he might be a great guy – but I can certainly say I’m tired of hearing his political rhetoric. Right now he’s bashing Paul Martin for his comment that the decision boils down to two parties, Liberals or Conservatives. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize that the NDP are incapable of forming the federal government of Canada in the election later this month. That certainly doesn’t mean their out of the race… they could help establish a minority government for the Liberals or Conservatives… but as far as who will form the government, it will either be Liberal or Conservative. Period. Any other prediction is nothing more than a flight of fancy.
More and more Canadians, I suspect, are feeling a lot like me. It’s like choosing between the devil and the deep blue sea, and we’re stuck with a ballot trying to mark an X on the least of 4 or 5 evils. Even when we thing we’ve made up our mind about our local representative, we then consider what will happen should their party constitute the federal government. Perhaps it’s just me, I’m not sure. Admittedly, I have a big political bias in that I thing politicians are double-tongued by definition. Even the most honorable politician has to represent the voices of his constituents, whether he agrees with them or not. Leave a comment, as I’d honestly like to hear other people’s views on this one.

